THE TORCH: THE #1 WORLDWIDE BRAND IN COMBAT ENTERTAINMENT COVERAGE - OVER 250 MILLION VIEWS & LISTENS PER YEAR REREACHING MORE FANS EVERY WEEK THAN ANY OTHER INDEPENDENT SOURCE • VIA THE WEB, MOBILE, PRINT NEWSLETTER, AND ITUNES
Jun 17, 2009 - 5:06:50 PM By Wade Keller, Torch editor Our online poll this week regarding Tim Sylvia's embarrassing loss to Ray Mercy indicates many MMATorch readers think Sylvia was never a legit top MMA fighter, so his loss means little in the big picture. I tend to agree with the 35 percent who voted for that option. You can't take Sylvia's wins away from him because his competition was any more than you can take away Fedor's wins because a lot of his competition was weak (including Sylvia and, increasing evidence suggests, Andre Arlovski).
However, even if Sylvia was never that good, I think it's a blow to the credibility of MMA in the sense that he was a headlining champion of the top MMA group and did face some good competition, including going the distance against Randy Couture in his prime at UFC 68. So until a legit MMA fighter beats a legit pro boxer, this will be a fight MMA skeptics and boxing fanatics can point to and laugh. Twenty percent in our poll believe Silva's loss is a blow to MMA's rep.
As if MMA fans needed it, it's one more reason to dislike Sylvia. In fact, 22 percent of the respondents dislike Sylvia more than they're protective of MMA's reputation, saying no matter how it reflects on MMA, they're happy he went down. That doesn't surprise me, and his loss does pretty assure he's had his last big payday - at least for a while. Can he ever redeem himself, and under what circumstances could he be given a chance?
There are 15 percent who believe the results are irrelevant given the circumstances and they barely care. The circumstances were odd, with changing rules at the last second, but I'm more apt to agree more with the eight percent who said it was a "fluke loss" for Sylvia who could have done better with a different strategy. Why did he choose to box a boxer? His no. 1 goal should have been avoid getting punches. He treated the fight like a sparring session where Ray Mercer was going to let him warm up for a round before they got serious. I do think in a rematch he would do better because, well, how could he not have learned a lesson from that debacle. It's not as if he'd necessarily lose ten out of ten fights. But he'd lose ten out of ten using that strategy, but if he got Mercer on the mat, who knows what would have happened.
If you haven't voted yet or want to look closer at the results, check out our MMATorch Poll Page
ALERT: Every Tuesday night, listen to the MMATorch Livecast from 9-10:30 p.m. ET or listen now to the most recent shows by clicking here. Listen live this coming Tuesday as Jamie Penick, Rich Hansen, and Matt Pelkey discuss the latest MMA happenings. Online listen at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/mmatorch or call into the show at 646-716-8090 to either just listen or participate.
"There's still a large contingent of people, that they just want to see these guys almost die, or the other guy almost die and come back, and sometimes fights are like that. Certainly they are. But sometimes you get technical masterpieces too, and to hate a beautiful, technical fight - you're not really a fight fan...
Diaz has a granite chin, possesses perhaps the best recovery in the sport, his pace and conditioning are second to none and he sets records with the volume of his punches almost every time he steps into the cage. Nick Diaz is simply designed to fight the way he fights, and not many other fighters are...
"There was a lot of poison going on around there and I'm really disappointed because we had a good thing going. It was a good thing and I think people's egos got in the way. Well, not people just Javier, his ego got in the way, and too many cameras in the gym and him trying to build himself up and his brand, his AKA brand...