CONTACTABOUTFACEBOOKTWITTERPODCAST IPHONE APPANDROID APPAMAZON APPWINDOWS APPRSS
NEW FORUM

GOT THE MMATORCH APP YET?
iPhone & iPad
Android
Kindle Fire
Windows Phone
MMATORCH IPHONE APP

MMATORCH

All the MMA News • Plus Intelligent, Brilliant, Addictive Points of View!
Independently Covering MMA Since 1993 • No Big Corporate Bosses

UFC
UFC 152 reportedly draws between 450K-460K pay-per-view buys
Oct 3, 2012 - 11:15:19 PM
UFC 152 reportedly draws between 450K-460K pay-per-view buys
DISCUSS ALL THIS IN OUR NEW MMATORCH FORUM
...OH, ONE MORE THING - PLEASE BOOKMARK US & VISIT DAILY!



By: Jamie Penick, MMATorch Editor-in-Chief

UFC_152_poster_180_9.jpg
The UFC had a surefire pay-per-view hit in the originally scheduled UFC 151 main event. Jon Jones had drawn over 700,000 pay-per-view buys in his previous fight against Rashad Evans in April, and a matchup against longtime MMA vet Dan Henderson seemed to be another highly entertaining matchup for Jones.

However, Henderson suffered a knee injury, and that ultimately resulted in Jones fighting later in the month at UFC 152. This time, he took on Vitor Belfort, a fighter who hadn't competed in his division in five years, and wasn't seen as much of a threat to the young Champion. Because of that, it was hard to see just how well the bout would draw on pay-per-view.

We've now got preliminary numbers, as Dave Meltzer reports in the latest edition of the Wrestling Observer Newsletter (subscription required) that the event drew between 450,000 and 460,000 buys. That's a preliminary number that could skew higher or lower as more information comes in, but it's a number in line with Jones' last several bouts - not including the outlying bout with Evans.

Penick's Analysis: The UFC may have done better on pay-per-view for the short run putting Jones in against Chael Sonnen on the UFC 152 event, but I'm not surprised with this number at all. The UFC 152 event would have done much worse than 450,000 buys without Jones on the card, so the fact that he still drew what has been around his average outside of the Evans fight is still a positive. He's not a star that can sell a million on his own, not yet. But he's still one of the most bankable fighters the UFC can book right now considering the numbers posted by many others. Even Anderson Silva needs a bankable opponent to draw, and Jones is in that stage of things at this point. This isn't a bad number, and considering what could have been for UFC 152 without Jones, it definitely had an effect.


DON'T GO YET... WE SUGGEST THESE MMATORCH ARTICLES, TOO!
Michael Bisping takes another shot at Anderson Silva after passing random USADA drug test
B.J. Penn responds to sexual assault allegations, claims extortion from accusers
Kevin Lee vs. Efrain Escudero, Danny Roberts vs. Dominique Steele join UFC 197 card in Las Vegas

comments powered by Disqus
HERE ARE EVEN MORE ARTICLES THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU

SELECT ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
SEARCH MMATORCH BY KEYWORD


MMATORCH CALENDAR OF EVENTS
CLICK HERE FOR LIST OF UPCOMING MMA EVENTS
CLICK TO SEE A UFC VIDEO BELOW

ARTICLES OF INTEREST ELSEWHERE
MMATORCH POLL - VOTE NOW!

Will T.J. Dillashaw and Urijah Faber eventually fight?
 
pollcode.com free polls

Do you think Daniel Cormier will defeat returning Jon Jones to legitimize UFC Light Heavyweight Title reign?
 
pollcode.com free polls

VOTE IN OR SEE RESULTS OF PREVIOUS POLLS

MMATORCH WEEKLY LIVECAST
Listen to the weekly MMATORCH LIVECAST on Blog Talk Radio


MMATORCH STAFF

EDITORS:

Wade Keller, supervising editor
(mmatorch@gmail.com)

Jamie Penick, editor-in-chief
(mmatorcheditor@gmail.com)

STAFF COLUMNISTS:

Shawn Ennis - Jason Amadi
Frank Hyden - Rich Hansen
Chris Park - Matt Pelkey


Interested in joining MMATorch's writing team? Send idea for a theme to your column (for Specialist section) or area of interest (i.e. TV Reporter) along with a sample of writing to mmatorch@gmail.com.

MORE MMA SITES
CONTACTABOUTFACEBOOKTWITTERPODCAST IPHONE APPANDROID APPAMAZON APPWINDOWS APPRSS
THE TORCH: #1 IN COMBAT ENTERTAINMENT COVERAGE | © 1999-2013 TDH Communications Inc. • All rights reserved -- PRIVACY POLICY