Email This Article - Printer-Friendly Pages - Contact Us

---

FACEBOOK TWITTER RSS APP PODCAST

Aug 31, 2009 - 11:33:52 AM

In response to two relatively bland Anderson Silva fights (but before his last win over Forrest Griffin), we asked: "Is it fair of UFC President Dana White to pressure fighters to be exciting even at the expense of preserving a likely win by being conservative?"

By a sizable majority (59 to 41 percent), you believe that it's unfair for White to put pressure on fighters to risk losing in order to be exciting. I agree with this. As I wrote several weeks back, it's a dangerous precedent to set if you start putting a priority on performance over winning. You open a Pandora's Box of possibilities at that point where fighter could even cooperate with each other to put on an exciting first two rounds before "really trying to win" in the third, or many other scenarios that would compromise the integrity of the sport. You also might have a champion risking losing by taking chances when a conservative approach would assure victory, and that's just not fair.

If rules could be changed to add excitement to the sport, which major league team sports often do (especially the NHL and NBA), then consider that (as they have done over the years with the "stand up" rule for instance). Otherwise, White is correct to accept that fans will sometimes be disappointed with fights or entire fight cards, but they also know that comes with the territory just as it does in any sport. There are enough really exciting fights and entire fight cards (such as UFC 102) that even a clunker now and then won't turn fans away.

[Dana White photo credit Wade Keller (c) MMATorch]

CLICK HERE FOR MORE UFC NEWS AND MMATORCH EXCLUSIVE FEATURES

Help support MMATorch by answering a brief anonymous demographic survey: CLICK HERE

Comment on this article below ad...

CLICK TO RETURN TO MAIN LISTING
OR CHOOSE SPECIFIC CATEGORY LISTING FROM DROP MENU

KELLER'S UFC 110 LIVE BLOG: Random thoughts in chronological order - Velasquez, Nogueira, Cro Cop, Wanderlei Silva, Bisping

KELLER BLOG: I have an idea for who would could face Anderson Silva and draw an enthusiastic PPV buyrate

KELLER: Tito Ortiz calling out Mark Coleman at UFC 109 is another example of Tito doing anything to stay relevant

KELLER'S UFC LIVE BLOG 2/6: Random thoughts in chronological order on fights, production, announcing, interviews, celebrities

KELLER: Does WEC want more than hardcore MMA viewers? Then improve that opening two minutes

KELLER'S UFC 108 BLOG: Random thoughts in chronological order (updated throughout show)

KELLER BLOG: MMA fans have nothing to fear with Shane McMahon trying to buy into UFC

KELLER'S TAKE: Tito Ortiz took UFC into pro wrestling territory with his third round performance and post-fight interview

KELLER: Tito Ortiz and Forrest Griffin shouldn't lecture fans when they had a right to be upset and frustrated

KELLER BLOG: Readers overwhelmingly don't think Brett Rogers deserves immediate rematch against Fedor, plus new Question of the Week

KELLER: The Machida vs. Shogun decision brings into question whether champions should get preferential scoring

KELLER'S BLOG: Kimbo Slice-Roy Nelson quick thoughts

KELLER BLOG: Dana White-Rampage Jackson mess makes both parties look unprofessional

KELLER'S UFC 103 BLOG: Random Thoughts in Chronological Order - Rich Franklin vs. Vitor Belfort, Cro Cop vs. Dos Santos, Koscheck vs. Trigg

KELLER: Strikeforce's marketing of Fedor during CBS show needs to be top notch

KELLER BLOG: Brandon Vera wasn't high on my list of Randy Couture opponents, but I like it

KELLER BLOG: Quick picks for whom I want to see and don't want to see Randy Couture fight next

KELLER BLOG: Tim Sylvia vs. Ray Mercer fallout - results of our reader poll and analysis of what it all indicates

KELLER BLOG: A perspective on Bent's column on whether UFC is following dangerous path WWE took

KELLER POLL BLOG: Should Dana White put pressure on fighters to have "exciting fights" even if it increases risk of losing?